Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Author
| Bateman, David F. | 5 |
| Yell, Mitchell L. | 2 |
| Chovanes, Jacquelyn | 1 |
| Papalia, Anne O. | 1 |
| Sayeski, Kristin L. | 1 |
| Yell, Mitchell | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Education Level
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Board of Education v Rowley | 3 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 2 |
| Endrew F v Douglas County… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkChovanes, Jacquelyn; Papalia, Anne O.; Bateman, David F.; Yell, Mitchell – Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 2021
This chapter describes possible effects of the 2017 "Endrew F." Supreme Court decision that raised the "de minimus" standard established in 1982 in "Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson School District v. Rowley." In Rowley, the court held school districts provided an appropriate education to students with…
Descriptors: Students with Disabilities, Court Litigation, Individualized Education Programs, Public Education
Sayeski, Kristin L.; Bateman, David F.; Yell, Mitchell L. – Intervention in School and Clinic, 2019
The Supreme Court decision in "Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District" (2017) established a higher standard of what constitutes an appropriate education for students receiving special education. In contrast to the previous standard provided in the "Board of Education v. Rowley" (1982) decision, which established that…
Descriptors: Preservice Teacher Education, Court Litigation, Special Education Teachers, Teaching Skills
Yell, Mitchell L.; Bateman, David F. – TEACHING Exceptional Children, 2017
Thirty-five years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision in "Rowley" (1982). The case, which was the first special education case to be heard by the Court, ruled on the question of what constituted Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) for students with disabilities under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Public Education, Court Litigation, Educational Legislation
Bateman, David F. – TEACHING Exceptional Children, 2009
William is 9 years of age, residing with his parent within the boundaries of an unnamed district ("the District"). As a student with autism he is eligible for special education programming and services. There was one issue presented for this due process hearing: What was the appropriate program and placement for him for the 2008-2009 school year?…
Descriptors: Private Schools, Neighborhood Schools, Civil Rights, Autism
Bateman, David F. – TEACHING Exceptional Children, 2008
Ben is a 16-year-old student who resides with his family in an unnamed School District. He is eligible for special education by reason of specific learning disability and ADHD. His parents requested a due process hearing, alleging that the District failed to provide him with a free appropriate public education (FAPE) and requesting reimbursement…
Descriptors: Private Schools, Learning Disabilities, Public Education, Court Litigation
