NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 16 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thompson, Robert J., Jr.; Curry, John F. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1985
Evaluated clinical utility and construct validity of seven new Missouri Children's Behavior Checklist behavior profiles and compared them to four original profiles. Results indicated that seven cluster solution classified equally as well as four cluster solution, but with increased differentiation into more specific internalizing and externalizing…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Children, Cluster Analysis, Developmental Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gross, Edward J.; And Others – Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1994
This study describes the development of the Active Treatment Client Rights checklist (ATCR), which was designed to facilitate the assessment, monitoring, and implementation of readily observable client active treatment services for adults with developmental disabilities. The ATCR was found to be highly reliable, valid, and useful in enhancing…
Descriptors: Adults, Check Lists, Developmental Disabilities, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Volkmar, Fred R.; And Others – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1992
This paper compared clinicians' diagnosis and DSM-III (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual), DSM-III-R (Revised), and ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases) diagnoses of 52 individuals with autism and 62 nonautistic, developmentally disordered individuals. The DSM-III-R system overdiagnosed the presence of autism, and ICD-10 closely…
Descriptors: Autism, Classification, Clinical Diagnosis, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kurita, Hiroshi; And Others – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1989
A Japanese translation of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale was used with 167 developmentally disabled children under age 16. Total score demonstrated a satisfactory level of taxonomic validity and discriminated infantile autism and other pervasive developmental disorders from mental retardation alone. A satisfactory concurrent validity on the…
Descriptors: Autism, Behavior Rating Scales, Children, Cultural Differences
Rousey, AnnMaria; And Others – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 1992
The Questionnaire on Resources and Stress (short form) was completed by 51 mothers and 42 fathers of children with severe developmental disabilities. Factor analysis of parcels found that gender of parent seemed to have minimal effect on perceptions of stress and coping. Validity of the questionnaire for use with mothers and fathers was supported.…
Descriptors: Children, Coping, Developmental Disabilities, Fathers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rutter, Michael; Schopler, Eric – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1992
This essay notes the complexities inherent in classifying pervasive developmental disorders (PDD), especially when a single classification scheme is to be used for clinical, research, and administrative purposes. The paper considers principles of classification, symptomatology, the neuropsychiatric interface, the value of a multiaxial approach,…
Descriptors: Classification, Clinical Diagnosis, Developmental Disabilities, Diagnostic Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rojahn, Johannes; Matson, Johnny L.; Lott, Denise; Esbensen, Anna J.; Smalls, Yemonja – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2001
The "Behavior Problems Inventory" (BPI) is a behavior rating instrument for self-injurious, stereotypic, and aggressive/destructive behavior in mental retardation and other developmental disabilities. Evaluation with 432 residents in a developmental center found the BPI to be a reliable (retest reliability, internal consistency, and…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Adults, Behavior Problems, Behavior Rating Scales
Salisbury, Christine L. – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 1989
The construct validity of the adapted version of the "Questionnaire on Resources and Stress-Short Form" was examined with 103 mothers of children with mild to severe developmental disabilities, aged 0-38. Results revealed that the questionnaire appears to be a valid, efficient, and effective measure of stress. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Adjustment (to Environment), Construct Validity, Developmental Disabilities, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Adrien, J. L.; And Others – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1992
This study established content validity and reliability for the Infant Behavioral Summarized Evaluation, a rating scale for young children with autism. Analysis of videotapes for 89 children (ages 6-48 months) revealed a significant group of 19 items, including characteristic early autistic behaviors and some less commonly described (such as…
Descriptors: Autism, Behavior Rating Scales, Content Validity, Developmental Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Aman, Michael G.; And Others – Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1996
The Child Behavior Rating Form (CBRF) was adapted for use with children having mental retardation and was named the Nisonger CBRF. Independent factor analyses of parent and teacher ratings for 369 children produced 2 Social Competence subscales and 6 Problem Behavior subscales. Internal consistency was generally high and parent-teacher agreement…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Behavior Rating Scales, Child Behavior, Developmental Disabilities
Baird, Samera Major; Folsom, Jacqueline – Diagnostique, 1993
Evaluation of the Kent Scoring Adaptation, which determines developmental ages in several domains based on an infant's performance on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, with 27 at-risk infants supported the concurrent validity of the cognitive, language, and, to a degree, social domains of the Kent procedure but not the fine and gross motor…
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Child Development, Cognitive Development, Concurrent Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
DiLalla, David L.; Rogers, Sally J. – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1994
Factor analysis of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale found three factors: (1) social impairment, (2) negative emotionality, and (3) distorted sensory response. Subjects with autism were distinguished from subjects with either pervasive or nonpervasive developmental disorders by higher scores on social impairment. Negative emotionality was most…
Descriptors: Autism, Behavior Rating Scales, Clinical Diagnosis, Developmental Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lindsey, Pam; Luckasson, Ruth – Mental Retardation, 1991
This study evaluated the Consent Screening Interview, which assesses the ability of adults with developmental disabilities to give direct consent for community residential placement. Interviews conducted with 17 adults with mental retardation and a control group of 8 individuals indicated that the instrument differentiated between those subjects…
Descriptors: Adults, Community Programs, Competence, Developmental Disabilities
Yu, Dickie; Feldman, Maurice – 1991
This book chapter outlines a number of key characteristics crucial to the integrity, utility, and efficiency of a behavioral assessment instrument for community living skills of people with developmental disabilities. In addition to basic psychometric considerations, the paper suggests that the functions of a behavioral assessment instrument could…
Descriptors: Adaptive Behavior (of Disabled), Behavior Rating Scales, Daily Living Skills, Developmental Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Einfeld, S. L.; Tonge, B. J. – Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1991
This paper offers a rationale for and a description of the creation of the Developmentally Delayed Children's Behaviour Checklist, which is completed by caregivers or teachers and uses a taxonometric model to describe the child's (ages 4-20) disturbed emotions and behaviors. Results of clinical validation studies are cited. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Behavior Problems, Behavior Rating Scales, Check Lists
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2