Descriptor
| Content Validity | 4 |
| Test Items | 4 |
| Intelligence Tests | 2 |
| Item Analysis | 2 |
| Latent Trait Theory | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Diagnostique | 1 |
Author
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 1 |
| Sabatino, David | 1 |
| Solomon, Alan | 1 |
| Vance, Booney | 1 |
| Wothke, Werner | 1 |
| Zimowski, Michele F. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 4 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| California Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Comprehensive Tests of Basic… | 1 |
| Metropolitan Achievement Tests | 1 |
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
| Raven Progressive Matrices | 1 |
| Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Vance, Booney; Sabatino, David – Diagnostique, 1991
The issues of construct validity, predictive validity, and item content bias on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) are examined. The review concludes that most objective data have not supported the issue of bias of the WISC-R when used with children of different ethnic backgrounds. (JDD)
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Content Validity, Elementary Secondary Education, Ethnic Groups
Solomon, Alan – 1987
A panel of expert referees from the Philadelphia school district categorized items from secondary-level standardized mathematics tests according to National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) subobjectives for mathematics. The following tests were covered by the study: (1) California Achievement Tests (Levels 19 and 20); (2) Comprehensive…
Descriptors: Content Validity, Educational Objectives, High Schools, Mathematical Concepts
Hambleton, Ronald K.; And Others – 1987
The study compared two promising item response theory (IRT) item-selection methods, optimal and content-optimal, with two non-IRT item selection methods, random and classical, for use in fixed-length certification exams. The four methods were used to construct 20-item exams from a pool of approximately 250 items taken from a 1985 certification…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Content Validity, Cutting Scores, Difficulty Level
Zimowski, Michele F.; Wothke, Werner – 1987
Tests of spatial ability were analyzed for their analog (visuospatial) and nonanalog (verbal reasoning) components, using factor analyses of items and test scores. The self-selected sample consisted of over 2000 clients (average age about 26 or 27) employing the Johnson O'Connor Research Foundation's aptitude evaluation services in 12 metropolitan…
Descriptors: Adults, Aptitude Tests, Content Validity, Factor Analysis


