Descriptor
Author
| Bruno, James E. | 1 |
| Jonassen, David H. | 1 |
| Lukin, Mark E. | 1 |
| Sorensen, H. Barbara | 1 |
| Suhadolnik, Debra | 1 |
| Weiss, David J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 5 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Armed Services Vocational… | 1 |
| Hidden Figures Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bruno, James E. – Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1987
Reports preliminary findings of a study which used a modified Admissible Probability Measurement (APM) test scoring system in the design of computer based instructional management systems. The use of APM for curriculum analysis is discussed, as well as its value in enhancing individualized learning. (Author/LRW)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Managed Instruction, Curriculum Evaluation, Design
Peer reviewedLukin, Mark E.; And Others – Computers in Human Behavior, 1985
This study utilized a Latin Squares design to assess equivalence of computer and paper-and-pencil testing methods in a clinical setting with college students. No significant differences between scores on measures of anxiety, depression, and psychological reactance were found across group and administration format. Most subjects preferred…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education, Literature Reviews
Weiss, David J.; Suhadolnik, Debra – 1982
The present monte carlo simulation study was designed to examine the effects of multidimensionality during the administration of computerized adaptive testing (CAT). It was assumed that multidimensionality existed in the individuals to whom test items were being administered, i.e., that the correct or incorrect responses given by an individual…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Factor Structure, Latent Trait Theory
Sorensen, H. Barbara – AEDS Monitor, 1985
This study validated computerized versions of selected tests from the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests of 1976, compared performance of higher education students on computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of the tests, and explored whether gender, academic status, or age interacted with the tests. (MBR)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Tests, Comparative Analysis
Jonassen, David H. – 1986
The purpose of this study was to adapt the Hidden Figures Test (a measure of field dependence/independence) to microcomputer display and to assess its alternate form reliability when compared to a paper and pencil test. Participants included 58 undergraduate and graduate students (91.4% female) at a southeastern university who were fairly normal…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Style


