NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Audience
Researchers70
Practitioners9
Teachers3
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 70 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morrongiello, Barbara A. – Developmental Psychology, 1984
A go/no-go conditioned head-turn paradigm was used to examine the abilities of 6- and 12-month-olds to discriminate changes in temporal grouping and their perception of absolute and relative timing information when listening to patterns of white-noise bursts. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Auditory Stimuli, Discrimination Learning, Infants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Byrne, Joseph M.; Horowitz, Frances Degen – Child Development, 1984
Examines discrimination of geometric shapes by three-month-old infants who were presented with geometric stimuli moving laterally at two different velocities. Finds that subjects discriminate between geometric forms at velocities that, according to previous findings, might interfere with shape discrimination. Discusses the possible interactive…
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Infants, Motion, Perceptual Development
Merrill, Edward C.; McCown, Steven M.; Kelley, Shirley – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 2001
Sixteen adolescents with mental retardation and 16 typical adolescents participated in a negative priming procedure in two experiments. Unlike previous studies, this study found that subjects exhibited inhibition under instructions to respond on the basis of stimulus identity in a manner similar to that of individuals without mental retardation.…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Cognitive Processes, Discrimination Learning, Mental Retardation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nozza, Robert J.; And Others – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1991
Infants (n=34) were tested on a speech-sound discrimination-in-noise task using the visual reinforcement of infant speech discrimination procedure. An adult control group was also tested. The infant-adult difference in discrimination threshold in noise was 6.9 dB. Advantages of this adaptive threshold procedure and possible applications are noted.…
Descriptors: Auditory Evaluation, Auditory Perception, Discrimination Learning, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nelson, Charles A.; Dolgin, Kim G. – Child Development, 1985
Examined seven-month-old infants' perceptions of happy and fearful facial expressions. Infants could generalize discrimination of expressions across male and female faces if first familiarized with happy faces. Infants tended to look longer at fear faces than at happy faces. Preferential responding was not specific to any individual face.…
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Facial Expressions, Fear, Generalization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Eilers, Rebecca; And Others – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1989
Results indicated that in both adults and infants combined cues facilitate discrimination of the phonemic contrast regardless of whether the cues cooperate or conflict. The three experiments did not support a phonetic interpretation of conflicting/cooperating cues for the perception of final stop consonant voicing. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Adults, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Infants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Allen, Prudence; And Others – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1989
Comparison of the auditory frequency resolving ability of preschool children, school-aged children, and adults found data from children as young as three-years-old that were qualitatively indistinguishable from adult data though threshold estimates from young children were more variable from run to run than from adults. Increasing age improved…
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Auditory Perception, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Watson, Betty U. – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1991
This study found correlations (.45 to .59) between scores on a battery of auditory discrimination tasks and measures of intelligence and academic aptitude in two samples of college students. An implication is that intelligence is a potential confounding variable in studies of the auditory perceptual abilities of various clinical populations.…
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, College Students, Disabilities, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sussman, Joan E. – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1991
This investigation examined the response strategies and discrimination accuracy of adults and children (aged 5-10) as the ratio of same to different trials was varied across 3 conditions of an auditory discrimination task. All subjects changed response strategies depending on the ratio of same-to-different trials. (DB)
Descriptors: Adults, Auditory Evaluation, Auditory Perception, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Serniclaes, Willy; Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane; Carre, Rene; Demonet, Jean-Francois – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2001
This study investigated the relationship between categorical perception and dyslexia by comparing the discrimination responses of 19 children with dyslexia and 17 average readers to sinewave analogues of speech sounds presented as either nonspeech whistles or as speech sounds. The study found an increased perceptibility of within-category…
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Style, Discrimination Learning, Dyslexia
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nelson, Charles A.; Salapatek, Philip – Child Development, 1986
When six-month-old infants are preexposed to one stimulus, they are later able to remember that stimulus and distinguish it from a previously unseen, novel stimulus; degree of experience with one stimulus and the magnitude of novelty effect positively covary. Neurological substrates of infants' memory skills are described. (RH)
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Infants, Memory, Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jones, Gillian; Smith, Peter K. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1984
Investigates preschool children's ability (n = 30) to discriminate age, and subject's use of different facial areas in ranking facial photographs into age order. Results indicate subjects from 3 to 9 years can successfully rank the photos. Compared with other facial features, the eye region was most important for success in the age ranking task.…
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Information Processing, Perception, Preschool Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dube, William V.; And Others – Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1993
An assessment of identity matching to sample with 2-dimensional forms was conducted with 44 subjects with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities. Overall, generalized identity matching was demonstrated in 34 of 44 subjects, including 7 of 16 individuals with mental age scores below 3.0 years. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Generalization, Moderate Mental Retardation, Severe Mental Retardation
Kroeger, Tracy L.; Rojahn, Johannes; Naglieri, Jack A. – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 2001
This study with 50 adults with mental retardation, found that performance on the Facial Discrimination Task (Emotional and Age Tasks) was significantly correlated to the Cognitive Assessment System total score. Hierarchical regression analyses produced results suggesting that cognitive processes are involved in processing facial stimuli in a…
Descriptors: Adults, Cognitive Processes, Discrimination Learning, Facial Expressions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brown, Davina M. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1985
To determine whether the effects of noncontingent feedback were transferable, 64 first-grade boys first were given a two-choice discrimination task and then a different contingent task. Results suggested that, even when conditions change, experience with prior noncontingent feedback disrupts the ability to use contingent information. (Author/BE)
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Feedback
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5