Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Test Reliability | 3 |
| Test Use | 3 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Clinical Diagnosis | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Freshmen | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Critical Thinking | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 3 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| California Critical Thinking… | 1 |
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Efficiency of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised.
Peer reviewedMueller, Horst H.; And Others – Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1984
Because diagnostic capability of the WISC-R has remained in doubt, its diagnostic suitability was assessed by applying Kelley's method of estimating the proportion of score differences in excess of chance to the original subscales, Bannatyne clusters, and Kaufman's three factor groupings. Caution should be used when applying WISC-R diagnostically.…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Tables (Data)
Peer reviewedJacobs, Stanley S. – Research in Higher Education, 1995
Comparison of college freshman performance on two different forms of the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (n=684, 692) found a lack of equivalence between forms and low internal consistency reliability. It is suggested that, although the test may be useful for research, it is not appropriate for decision making about individual students.…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Comparative Analysis, Critical Thinking, Educational Research
Cashin, William E. – 1985
There are four reasons why comparative data is needed for student ratings of faculty performance: (1) the considerable inflation of student ratings; (2) the great variability in the way students rate different items; (3) because student rating systems must be flexible and comparable; and (4) because of factors (such as student motivation, class…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education


