NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners40
Researchers23
Administrators2
Teachers2
Parents1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 40 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barton, Jean M.; Starnes, Waveline T. – Roeper Review, 1989
Patterns of intelligence scale subtest scores and standardized achievement test scores of 80 gifted and 41 gifted learning-disabled students were compared. A distinctive cognitive pattern of intelligence test scores and patterns in group achievement test scores were identified to target students warranting more in-depth evaluation for early…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Achievement Tests, Early Identification, Educational Diagnosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Khatena, Joe – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1989
The paper describes methods of identifying giftedness, instruments for assessing creativity, and the need for a single measure of many different kinds of talent. Development of the Khatena-Morse Multitalent Perception Inventory, which identifies talent in the areas of art, music, leadership, and creativity, is discussed. (JDD)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Art, Creativity, Creativity Tests
Tempest, Phyllis; Skipper, Betty – Diagnostique, 1988
Norms were developed for Navajo Indian students for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised, by sampling 16 percent of the Navajo school population from first through eighth grade in 8 schools in McKinley County, New Mexico. The norms, based on 539 students, help to separate cultural and language differences from learning…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, American Indians, Cultural Influences, Disabilities
Shaughnessy, Michael F.; Fickling, Kris L. – 1991
A school psychologist and parent looks at issues related to testing for "giftedness," including labeling and placement (or non-placement) in special programs. Factors to consider in deciding whether to have a child tested are considered, with examples given of students whose individual situations and personalities either do not qualify them for…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Decision Making, Elementary Secondary Education, Eligibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Melesky, Thomas J. – NABE: The Journal for the National Association for Bilingual Education, 1985
Hispanic children are often considered ineligible for participation in programs for the gifted and talented because of identification procedures that rely heavily on tests which are inappropriate for use with Spanish-speaking children and because of the widespread acceptance of an essentially inaccurate definition of giftedness as synonymous with…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Gifted Disadvantaged
Drons, Michael T. – 1989
This publication provides Maine school administrative unit personnel with guidelines to implement procedures for identifying gifted and talented children. Legislative requirements are presented on the left-hand pages and suggested guidelines for implementing the requirements are on the right-hand pages. Requirements and guidelines are organized…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Aptitude Tests, Art, Check Lists
Carvajal, Howard – Diagnostique, 1988
Fifty-one gifted children, aged 9-17, were tested with the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition, and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Correlations indicated that the Peabody may be of value in screening students being considered for gifted placement. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Concurrent Validity, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted
Community School District 18, Brooklyn, NY. – 1991
This packet contains a set of assessment activities to identify gifted and talented children at the kindergarten level, based on Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. The six assessments measure linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, and interpersonal/intrapersonal intelligence. For each assessment,…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Evaluation Methods, Gifted, Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Meyen, Edward – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This response argues that Linda Siegel's paper (EC221505) confuses measures of intelligence with predicted achievement, calls for doing away with the construct of learning disabilities rather than the discrepancy definition model, and overlooks the need to determine which students qualify for special educational services for treatment of learning…
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baldwin, R. Scott; Vaughn, Sharon – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This critique of a paper by Linda Siegel (EC221505) challenges Siegel's assumptions on the relationship of Intelligence Quotient to learning disabilities as being unacceptable and non-literature-based, and points out that discussion of Intelligence Quotient cutoffs may be moot given that 49 states employ no cutoff for learning disabilities. (JDD)
Descriptors: Definitions, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Glutting, Joseph J.; Bear, George G. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1989
The study evaluated the utility of Kaufman-Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) subtests in differentiating learning-disabled children from students with other handicapping conditions, and compared K-ABC subtests with Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised subtests. Results showed that subtest scores did not enhance differential…
Descriptors: Classification, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stanovich, Keith E. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This commentary supports Linda Siegel's challenge to the learning disabilities field (in EC221505) to produce data indicating that dyslexic readers differ from other poor readers in their cognitive processing, educational prognosis, and response to treatment. The commentary also points out that the existence of Matthew effects reinforces Siegel's…
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Quotient
Buse, Sylvia T.; McCall, Virgil W. – 1988
The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Revised and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) were compared using a sample of 26 developmentally disabled children, aged 32 to 73 months. The focus of the study was to determine the feasibility of the K-ABC both for assessment and for planning more effective remediation programs for this…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Siegel, Linda S. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
Use of the discrepancy approach in defining learning disabilities is challenged, as intelligence tests do not measure potential, are not independent from what is measured by achievement tests, and are not powerful predictors of low reading performance. Use of intelligence tests in analysis, identification, and definition of learning disabilities…
Descriptors: Definitions, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Torgesen, Joseph K. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
In commenting on Linda Siegel's argument (in EC221505) that Intelligence Quotient is not causally related to reading difficulties, this paper argues that Intelligence Quotient is relevant to the definition of reading disabilities but that present knowledge may not justify its use in the selection of children for special services. (JDD)
Descriptors: Definitions, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3