Descriptor
| College Role | 1 |
| Faculty Development | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Job Satisfaction | 1 |
| Mathematical Formulas | 1 |
| Participant Satisfaction | 1 |
| Productivity | 1 |
| Research | 1 |
| Teacher Attitudes | 1 |
| Teacher Motivation | 1 |
Source
| Innovative Higher Education | 1 |
Author
| Baker, Merl | 1 |
Publication Type
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBaker, Merl – Innovative Higher Education, 1991
A major barrier to the exploitation of college faculty renewal programs has been a lack of tangible measurements of achievement in academic functions. Functional productivity indices can be used as tools to motivate both individuals and institutions to take advantage of renewal opportunities and assess their renewal experiences. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Role, Faculty Development, Higher Education, Job Satisfaction
