Descriptor
| Ability Identification | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Gifted | 2 |
| Predictive Measurement | 2 |
| Screening Tests | 2 |
| Educational Diagnosis | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| French | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Immersion Programs | 1 |
| Intelligence Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Roeper Review | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Raven Progressive Matrices | 1 |
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKitano, Margie K.; DeLeon, Josie – Roeper Review, 1988
The impact of the Stanford Binet Fourth Edition was compared with the Stanford Binet L-M on the identification of gifted children for a university affiliated preschool. The fourth edition test composite identified fewer preschool age children as gifted when the criterion was set at 1.5 standard deviations above the mean. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Analysis, Gifted, Intelligence Tests
Download full textBurnham, Brian; And Others – 1987
The York Region Board of Education in Ontario, Canada, screens students for giftedness in grade 3. This report analyzes data produced in the 1986-87 screening procedure, involving approximately 3,400 students. The report begins with a review of procedural changes that were designed to make the screening more effective and efficient than earlier…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Analysis, Educational Diagnosis, Foreign Countries
