Descriptor
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Incentives | 2 |
| Schools | 2 |
| State Programs | 2 |
| Teachers | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Change Strategies | 1 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
| Educational Improvement | 1 |
| Merit Pay | 1 |
| Performance | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Education and Urban Society | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Policymakers | 2 |
Location
| California | 1 |
| South Carolina | 1 |
| Wisconsin | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedCibulka, James G. – Education and Urban Society, 1989
Analyzes state performance incentive programs in California, South Carolina, and Wisconsin. Findings suggest that incentive programs vary in effectiveness, indicating that program design is critical to success, and that most of the programs do not have high monetary costs. (FMW)
Descriptors: Change Strategies, Cost Effectiveness, Elementary Secondary Education, Incentives
Download full textThomas, M. Donald; Welch, Charles – 1984
South Carolina's comprehensive Education Improvement Act of 1984 includes provisions for the development and implementation of statewide incentive pay programs for teachers, principals, and schools. The provision affecting teachers mandates the development and field testing of up to three programs between 1984 and 1986 and the implementation of…
Descriptors: Administrators, Educational Improvement, Elementary Secondary Education, Incentives
