Descriptor
| Child Advocacy | 4 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
| Gifted | 4 |
| Program Development | 4 |
| Talent | 4 |
| Lobbying | 3 |
| Public Relations | 3 |
| Economic Factors | 1 |
| Economic Progress | 1 |
| Educational Cooperation | 1 |
| Educational Practices | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Gifted Child Quarterly | 4 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Policymakers | 4 |
| Administrators | 3 |
| Practitioners | 3 |
Location
| Wisconsin | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedDettmer, Peggy – Gifted Child Quarterly, 1991
Guidelines for promoting gifted education programs are offered, including being judicious in promotion efforts, developing support among different role groups, and strengthening support within role groups (e.g., teachers, parents, students, administrators, community leaders, policymakers, and business leaders). A cyclic model of advocacy stages is…
Descriptors: Child Advocacy, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Lobbying
Peer reviewedRosenstein, Peter; Dettmer, Peggy – Gifted Child Quarterly, 1991
This interview with the executive director of the National Association for Gifted Children documents responses to questions about gifted program advocacy, including opposition to differentiated education for gifted students, effective lobbying techniques, and relationships with legislators and the business community. (DB)
Descriptors: Child Advocacy, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Lobbying
Peer reviewedGallagher, James J. – Gifted Child Quarterly, 1991
This article argues that providing good gifted and talented education programs is in the nation's economic self-interest and is essential to the United States' future economic competitiveness in the world community. (DB)
Descriptors: Child Advocacy, Economic Factors, Economic Progress, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedSchatz, Ellie – Gifted Child Quarterly, 1991
A Wisconsin advocacy model for gifted education programs is presented, emphasizing ongoing collaboration and dissemination to most effectively utilize meager resources. Essential elements of the dissemination design are identified, including use of regional sites, requiring participation of an administrator on the team, group problem solving, and…
Descriptors: Child Advocacy, Educational Cooperation, Educational Practices, Elementary Secondary Education


