Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 4 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| O'Reilly, Robert C. | 2 |
| Yell, Mitchell L. | 2 |
| Ahearn, Eileen M. | 1 |
| Arnberger, Kelly | 1 |
| Brady, Kevin P. | 1 |
| Brady, Michael P. | 1 |
| Brown, Frank | 1 |
| Connors, Eugene T. | 1 |
| Couvillon, Michael A. | 1 |
| Cummings, Christa | 1 |
| Dagley, Dave | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
| Administrators | 27 |
| Practitioners | 20 |
| Policymakers | 7 |
| Teachers | 4 |
| Parents | 3 |
| Researchers | 1 |
| Students | 1 |
Location
| Iowa | 2 |
| California | 1 |
| Florida | 1 |
| Idaho | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lisa Goran; David F. Bateman – Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2023
"Related Services in Special Education: Working Together as a Team" is a resource for anyone who works with school-age children with disabilities to showcase the professional expertise and value-add related services providers bring to the IEP team and school community. With a theme of intentional collaboration and communication, this…
Descriptors: Special Education, Court Litigation, Case Studies, Students with Disabilities
Cummings, Christa – ProQuest LLC, 2023
It is estimated that twenty percent of the general population has some signs of dyslexia, and eighty percent of the students eligible for special education under Specific Learning Disability (SLD) are eligible due to reading deficits. As research on dyslexia and our knowledge of best practice identification and intervention grows, it is no…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Court Litigation, Response to Intervention, Multi Tiered Systems of Support
Dieterich, Cynthia A.; Kucharczyk, Suzanne; Brady, Kevin P. – Journal of Special Education Leadership, 2019
As mandated by federal law, all students with a disability who qualify for special education and related services must be provided a free appropriate public education (FAPE). With ongoing changes to statutory definitions and legal interpretation of what constitutes a FAPE under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA, 2004), it can…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Individualized Education Programs, Students with Disabilities, Equal Education
Couvillon, Michael A.; Yell, Mitchell L.; Katsiyannis, Antonis – Preventing School Failure, 2018
Even though special education law is covered in most teacher and administrative certification programs, it is an area that is continually evolving. The results of the 2017 U.S. Supreme Court case "Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District" will have a lasting impact on the future of special education guidelines; the outcomes of this…
Descriptors: Special Education, Court Litigation, Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation
Menard, Lauren A. – Online Submission, 2011
A contextual analysis of the general education default and student benefit is presented from the perspective of school-based compliance with federal mandates from IDEIA [Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act] of 2004. A goal was to inform school administrators striving to develop and maintain effective, inclusive learning…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Inclusion, General Education, Special Education
Giesler, Mark A.; Palladino, John M. – Online Submission, 2009
Administering and supervising special education programs and personnel may be daunting tasks for school leaders. Students and families who warrant the access to special education services present unique and complex needs that make administrative decisions anything but universal and simplistic, especially in regards to foster care populations. The…
Descriptors: Student Rights, Federal Legislation, Child Welfare, Disabilities
Dowling-Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1998
The 4th Circuit's decision in "Hartman v Loudoun County Board of Education," involving the placement of an 11-year-old autistic child, teaches important lessons about the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: mainstreaming is a strong preference, not an unyielding requirement; and if educators make active and careful efforts to…
Descriptors: Autism, Court Litigation, Disabilities, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedLincoln, Eugene A. – West's Education Law Reporter, 1989
In deciding "Honig v. Doe" the United States Supreme Court held that the unilateral exclusion of a handicapped student for conduct caused by the student's disability, for a period in excess of 10 school days, constitutes a prohibited change of placement. Identifies and discusses seven unanswered questions regarding disciplining…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Disabilities, Discipline, Elementary Secondary Education
Brady, Michael P.; Gunter, Phil – Executive Educator, 1985
Delivering appropriate education to severely handicapped students poses unique legal problems for schools. Legal issues involved in actual court cases are reviewed and show that concern over potential liability may be unwarranted if the following areas are understood: what is appropriate education and when is a teacher liable? (MD)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Exceptional Persons, Individualized Education Programs
Brown, Frank – School Business Affairs, 2003
Shows the complexity of special-education programs and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) due-process requirements and the costs associated with special education. Lists the procedural safeguards for parents under IDEA. (MLF)
Descriptors: Costs, Court Litigation, Due Process, Educational Finance
Peer reviewedYell, Mitchell L.; And Others – Education and Treatment of Children, 1995
This article explicates the current legislation, case law, and administrative law governing the discipline of students with disabilities. Guidelines are offered that divide disciplinary procedures into three categories: permitted, controlled, and prohibited. The role of the Individualized Education Program team in planning proactive disciplinary…
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Discipline Policy
Peer reviewedRothstein, Laura F. – Journal of Law and Education, 1985
Examines the areas in which educational misconduct involving handicapped students is likely to occur. Argues for accountability for such misconduct and discusses why remediation should be by common law tort action. Explains why the Handicapped Children Act procedures are not appropriate in litigation. (MD)
Descriptors: Accidents, Court Litigation, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education
Dagley, Dave – School Business Affairs, 1993
Provides information on how school districts can reduce their fiscal liability under the Handicapped Child Protection Act (HCPA) of 1986. School officials that present an image of service and cooperation for disabled students are less likely to have a dispute and less likely to have to pay attorneys' fees. (Contains 32 references.) (MLF)
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Court Litigation, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education
Lee, Young-Yon – 1995
This paper is intended to provide school officials and teachers with the necessary legal background, procedural requirements, and guidance for appropriate implementation of individualized educational programs (IEPs) with violent students with disabilities. Specifically it addresses: (1) the legal background of special education under the…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Disabilities, Discipline
Ahearn, Eileen M. – 1994
This report reviews current state policy and practices in the disciplining of students with disabilities, as they are expressed in state documents including statutes, regulations, and other types of written records. Federal law, regulations, and case law are summarized in the report's introduction and background. Findings are presented in terms of…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Definitions, Disabilities, Discipline
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2
Direct link
