Descriptor
Source
| New Directions for… | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 3 |
| Practitioners | 3 |
| Researchers | 3 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMallette, Bruce I. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
Examination of popular publications that rate and rank collegiate undergraduate education reveals several methodological concerns. The challenges for consumers and researchers are to know what shortcomings exist in these ratings, what impact the shortcomings have on the rankings, and what methodological changes might improve the evaluations.…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education
Peer reviewedMcGuire, Michael D. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
It is argued that research testing the reliability and validity of college and university reputational studies should be conducted, a concern not raised by consumers and publishers. Two studies of "America's Best Colleges," published by "U.S. News and World Report," raise questions about the guide's validity and suggest that…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedStuart, Debra L. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
Debate grows over the validity and reliability of college and university rankings, which judge rather than describe institutions, as the public's willingness to accept them increases. While many institutional characteristics can be measured, measurement methods need improvement. One solution is to publish the peer studies that the institutions…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Guides


