Descriptor
Author
| O'Reilly, Robert C. | 2 |
| Brady, Michael P. | 1 |
| Connors, Eugene T. | 1 |
| Gunter, Phil | 1 |
| Lincoln, Eugene A. | 1 |
| Rothstein, Laura F. | 1 |
| Sayler, Mary R. | 1 |
| Underwood, Julie | 1 |
| Vacca, Richard S. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 15 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 6 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Guides - General | 1 |
| Multilingual/Bilingual… | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 15 |
| Practitioners | 15 |
| Policymakers | 4 |
| Parents | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| Michigan | 3 |
| North Dakota | 1 |
| Ohio | 1 |
| Oklahoma | 1 |
| South Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Education for All Handicapped… | 6 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 2 |
| Vocational Rehabilitation Act… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedLincoln, Eugene A. – West's Education Law Reporter, 1989
In deciding "Honig v. Doe" the United States Supreme Court held that the unilateral exclusion of a handicapped student for conduct caused by the student's disability, for a period in excess of 10 school days, constitutes a prohibited change of placement. Identifies and discusses seven unanswered questions regarding disciplining…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Disabilities, Discipline, Elementary Secondary Education
Brady, Michael P.; Gunter, Phil – Executive Educator, 1985
Delivering appropriate education to severely handicapped students poses unique legal problems for schools. Legal issues involved in actual court cases are reviewed and show that concern over potential liability may be unwarranted if the following areas are understood: what is appropriate education and when is a teacher liable? (MD)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Exceptional Persons, Individualized Education Programs
Peer reviewedRothstein, Laura F. – Journal of Law and Education, 1985
Examines the areas in which educational misconduct involving handicapped students is likely to occur. Argues for accountability for such misconduct and discusses why remediation should be by common law tort action. Explains why the Handicapped Children Act procedures are not appropriate in litigation. (MD)
Descriptors: Accidents, Court Litigation, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education
Administration for Children, Youth, and Families (DHHS), Washington, DC. Head Start Bureau. – 1993
This document consolidates, clarifies, and updates federal regulations on Head Start services for children with disabilities. The regulations are designed to complement the Head Start Program Performance Standards governing services to all enrolled children. Specifically, these regulations require Head Start programs to: (1) design comprehensive…
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Disabilities, Disability Identification, Disadvantaged Youth
North Dakota State Dept. of Public Instruction, Bismarck. Div. of Special Education. – 1999
This document presents North Dakota standards and guidelines for planning early childhood special education programs for children with disabilities. The first section offers program guidelines covering eligibility of students, approval of services, the service delivery system, transition, and size of enrollment/caseload. The next section discusses…
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Disabilities, Early Childhood Education, Eligibility
Connors, Eugene T.; Vacca, Richard S. – 1981
The section of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (P.L. 94-142) detailing "appropriate education" as a function of an Individualized Education Program (IEP) regulates a variety of educational considerations. Arguing that the IEP is in fact "the hub of the special education wheel," the authors of this document begin…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Educational Malpractice, Educational Needs
Michigan State Dept. of Education, Lansing. Div. of Special Education. – 1984
The Special Education Services of the Michigan Department of Education has prepared the State Plan for the delivery of special education programs and services starting July 1, 1983 through June 30, 1986 according to guidelines and rules established under Title VI Part B of P.L. 94-142, The Education for All Handicapped Children Act. This plan…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Confidentiality, Disabilities, Due Process
Ohio State Dept. of Education, Columbus. Div. of Early Childhood Education. – 1995
This manual of recommended policies and procedures was developed to assist Ohio school districts in meeting the spirit and intent of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and related federal and state regulations. Section 1 presents information on requirements concerning provision of a free appropriate public education for children with…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Confidentiality, Disabilities, Disability Identification
Michigan State Dept. of Education, Lansing. Special Education Services. – 1997
This document presents the State of Michigan's administrative rules for special education including 1996 and 1997 revisions. The specific regulations are organized into 9 sections: (1) general provisions (definitions and determination standards); (2) evaluation, eligibility, student assignment, and due process procedures (e.g., individualized…
Descriptors: Confidentiality, Conflict Resolution, Definitions, Disabilities
South Carolina State Dept. of Education, Columbia. Office of Programs for the Handicapped. – 1986
The manual is designed to assist school districts in South Carolina in measuring and maintaining compliance with Public Law 94-142 (the Education for All Handicapped Children Act). Using a checklist format, it is divided into sections which address the following topics: (1) local education agency (LEA) policy requirements; (2) state-operated…
Descriptors: Board of Education Policy, Compliance (Legal), Confidentiality, Disabilities
Michigan State Dept. of Education, Lansing. Special Education Services. – 1986
This booklet describes administrative rules (revised in 1984) regarding the delivery of special education services in Michigan. Presented in a question answer format, the guide explains current rules regarding: the Individualized Educational Planning Committee Process; Independent Educational Evaluation at public expense; vocational evaluation;…
Descriptors: Administrator Qualifications, Disabilities, Educational Administration, Educational Diagnosis
Underwood, Julie; And Others – 1996
The concept of integrating children with disabilities into public school classrooms has paralleled the movement to integrate children of different races. In 1975, Congress enacted the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (EAHCA), which became effective in 1977. Through regulations detailing precise procedural guidelines, EAHCA has…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Disabilities, Discipline Policy
O'Reilly, Robert C.; Sayler, Mary R. – 1985
School principals perform a crucial role in discharging a school system's legal obligations toward the handicapped. Since principals are unable to supply money damages, they are rarely primary targets of lawsuits involving handicapped children, but their role in representing Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) to parents is critical. Thus,…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Board of Education Role, Court Litigation, Disabilities
O'Reilly, Robert C. – 1986
This paper reviews federal and state court interpretations of federal and state laws concerning the responsibilities of local school districts in providing free and appropriate education for handicapped children. Particular attention is paid to the building principal's responsibility in carrying out the mandated policies at the operational level,…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Court Litigation, Disabilities, Due Process
Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Oklahoma City. Div. of Special Education. – 1991
The manual is intended to support the Oklahoma State Plan for Special Education by establishing minimum standards for program approval, for determination of pupil eligibility, and for appropriate programming within the least restrictive environment. After delineating responsibilities of state and local agencies, the following programmatic aspects…
Descriptors: Ancillary School Services, Communication Aids (for Disabled), Confidentiality, Delivery Systems


