Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Experimental Groups | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| History | 1 |
| Intervention | 1 |
| Knowledge Level | 1 |
| Learning Disabilities | 1 |
| Multivariate Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Learning… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 6 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 1 |
| Wechsler Individual… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDe La Paz, Susan; Wissinger, Daniel R. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2017
In this study, we explored the potential of two forms of discussion (disciplinary vs. traditional) for 39 sixth- and seventh-grade students with or at risk for learning disabilities (LD), before writing historical arguments. Nine teachers who led small group discussions in six heterogeneous social studies classrooms implemented the intervention.…
Descriptors: At Risk Students, Learning Disabilities, Writing Improvement, Grade 6
