Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| English (Second Language) | 2 |
| Language Tests | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Foreign Students | 1 |
| Grade Point Average | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Michigan | 2 |
| California (Los Angeles) | 1 |
| Georgia | 1 |
| Indiana | 1 |
| Iowa | 1 |
| Minnesota | 1 |
| New York | 1 |
| Washington | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 2 |
| Michigan Test of English… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHille, Kathryn; Cho, Yeonsuk – Language Testing, 2020
Accurate placement within levels of an ESL program is crucial for optimal teaching and learning. Commercially available tests are commonly used for placement, but their effectiveness has been found to vary. This study uses data from the Ohio Program of Intensive English (OPIE) at Ohio University to examine the value of two commercially available…
Descriptors: Student Placement, Testing, English (Second Language), Language Tests
Download full textWeigle, Sara Cushing – ETS Research Report Series, 2011
Automated scoring has the potential to dramatically reduce the time and costs associated with the assessment of complex skills such as writing, but its use must be validated against a variety of criteria for it to be accepted by test users and stakeholders. This study addresses two validity-related issues regarding the use of e-rater® with the…
Descriptors: Scoring, English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Automation
