Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 3 |
| Predictor Variables | 3 |
| Reaction Time | 3 |
| Color | 2 |
| Short Term Memory | 2 |
| Acoustics | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Aphasia | 1 |
| Assistive Technology | 1 |
| Attention | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Faroqi-Shah, Yasmeen | 1 |
| Gehman, Megan | 1 |
| Kane, Michael J. | 1 |
| McVay, Jennifer C. | 1 |
| Moberly, Aaron C. | 1 |
| Reed, Jessa | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stroop Color Word Test | 3 |
| Digit Span Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkFaroqi-Shah, Yasmeen; Gehman, Megan – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2021
Purpose: When speakers retrieve words, they do so extremely quickly and accurately--both speed and accuracy of word retrieval are compromised in persons with aphasia (PWA). This study examined the contribution of two domain-general mechanisms: processing speed and cognitive control on word retrieval in PWA. Method: Three groups of participants,…
Descriptors: Aphasia, Language Processing, Cognitive Processes, Age Differences
Moberly, Aaron C.; Reed, Jessa – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2019
Purpose: Speech recognition relies upon a listener's successful pairing of the acoustic--phonetic details from the bottom-up input with top-down linguistic processing of the incoming speech stream. When the speech is spectrally degraded, such as through a cochlear implant (CI), this role of top-down processing is poorly understood. This study…
Descriptors: Adults, Assistive Technology, Hearing Impairments, Acoustics
McVay, Jennifer C.; Kane, Michael J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
A combined experimental, individual-differences, and thought-sampling study tested the predictions of executive attention (e.g., Engle & Kane, 2004) and coordinative binding (e.g., Oberauer, Suss, Wilhelm, & Sander, 2007) theories of working memory capacity (WMC). We assessed 288 subjects' WMC and their performance and mind-wandering rates…
Descriptors: Performance Factors, Reaction Time, Short Term Memory, Predictor Variables
