Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Reports - Research | 8 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Florida | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 18 |
Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 3 |
Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 2 |
Bayley Mental Development… | 1 |
California Achievement Tests | 1 |
Preschool Inventory | 1 |
Slosson Intelligence Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Rogers, Sally J. – Journal of School Psychology, 1982
Administered the Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) to 92 preschool children. Administered the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale to a sample of the group, and the results were compared to the results from the SIT. Results indicated the SIT overestimated the performance of average preschool children. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests, Preschool Children, Scores
Shorr, David N.; And Others – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1977
Discrepancies between the mental age (MA) scores and the mean performance of chronological age (CA) groups in the latest revision of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale are noted. A table is presented for converting published Stanford-Binet MA scores into MA scores that are congruent with the above definition. (Author)
Descriptors: Children, Cognitive Development, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests

Chase, Christopher H.; Sattler, Jerome M. – School Psychology Review, 1980
Sattler's standard deviation technique for interpreting strengths and weaknesses on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale has been simplified by Kaufman and Waterstreet in the form of an easy-to-use table. A refinement of their table is presented, with an example to demonstrate its use. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Chronological Age, Error of Measurement, Intelligence Tests, Mental Age

Robinson, Nancy M.; And Others – Intelligence, 1990
The validity of the fourth edition of the Stanford-Binet (S-B IV) test was studied with 30 linguistically precocious children at ages 20, 24, and 30 months. Validity at 24 months was questionable. Problems in using the test with very young children are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Child Development, Cognitive Processes, Intelligence Tests

Bloom, Allan S.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1983
Administered the Stanford-Binet and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Revised) to 121 children with developmental problems. Results showed 28 children received absolute differences of 12 points or greater between the Binet and the WISC-R. There were 10 instances of complete incongruence between the Binet and all the WISC-R IQs. (JAC)
Descriptors: Children, Developmental Disabilities, Diagnostic Tests, Educational Diagnosis
Cline, Marvin G. – 1966
To reemphasize the dangers inherent in the misuse of testing instruments, a study of language and cognitive development in poverty preschoolers investigated 1) whether the interpretation of Peabody scores could be applied to this population, and 2) the contribution of the linguistic form of the Peabody to performance. (MS)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Age Differences, Anxiety, Black Students
Silverman, Linda; Kearney, Kathi – 1992
This article maintains that the older Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (Form L-M) is the best tool for assessing extraordinarily gifted children despite the acknowledged deficits of the scale in comparison with newer instruments. Although the article finds that the Stanford-Binet uses outdated terminology, is highly verbal, has 20-year-old norms,…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Academically Gifted, Elementary Secondary Education, Eligibility
Batemen, Barbara – J Sch Psychol, 1968
Descriptors: Group Testing, Handicapped Children, Intelligence Tests, Mental Retardation
KENNEDY, WALLACE A. – 1965
FOLLOWUP STUDIES WERE MADE ON 312 NEGRO CHILDREN, APPROXIMATELY ONE FIFTH OF A SAMPLE OF 1800 STUDENTS TESTED IN A PREVIOUS STUDY. THEY REPRESENTED A STRATIFIED RANDOM SAMPLE OF RURAL, URBAN, AND METROPOLITAN AREAS OF A SOUTHERN STATE. INSTRUMENTS USED FOR SCORING INCLUDED THE STANFORD-BINET, THE CALIFORNIA ACHIEVEMENT TEST, AND THE GOODENOUGH…
Descriptors: Black Achievement, Black Students, Disadvantaged, Educational Needs
Caldwell, Mark B.; Knight, David – J Negro Educ, 1970
Results of the study indicate that the race of the examiner is not a critical variable in test performance relating to Negro students. (KG)
Descriptors: Black Students, Examiners, Grade 6, Intelligence Tests

Mishra, Shitala P. – Psychology in the Schools, 1983
Examined whether scoring of Stanford-Binet test items might be influenced by the examiner's prior knowledge of subjects' ethnicity and IQ. Stanford-Binet protocols (N=36) of subjects from five to eight years old were divided into four groups and assigned four groups of examiners. Results suggested no bias. (Author/JAC)
Descriptors: Bias, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Ethnicity

Silverman, Linda Kreger; Kearney, Katheryn – Roeper Review, 1992
The Stanford-Binet IV is compared to the original version and criticized for having less power to measure the high end of intelligence and for having norms that discriminate against gifted students. Strengths of the Stanford-Binet L-M are pointed out, and use of both scales for different purposes is recommended. (JDD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests

Ellzey, John; Karnes, Frances A. – Rural Special Education Quarterly, 1993
For 40 gifted students, the mean Full Scale score of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised was 13.52 points higher than the mean composite score of the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition (Binet-IV). Between the two instruments, 11 of 15 possible subscale correlations were significant. Use of the Binet-IV might result in placement of…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests

Waddell, Deborah D. – Journal of School Psychology, 1980
A review of the technical data available on the 1972 norms edition of the Stanford-Binet demonstrates how inadequate these data are. The Stanford-Binet should not continue to be used in important decision making processes unless this weakness is corrected. (Author)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests

Bloom, Allan S.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1976
WISC-Rs and Stanford-Binets were administered to 50 children with developmental disabilities referred for comprehensive evaluations. Fifty-four percent of the children received different classifications using the two instruments. Different classifications of intellectual level may be derived for the same child depending upon which test is used.…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicapped Children
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2