Descriptor
| Intelligence Quotient | 2 |
| Standardized Tests | 2 |
| Testing Problems | 2 |
| Cognitive Tests | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Disadvantaged | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Experimental Groups | 1 |
| Gifted | 1 |
| Intelligence Tests | 1 |
| Maturation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Roeper Review | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 2 |
| Preschool Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSilverman, Linda Kreger; Kearney, Katheryn – Roeper Review, 1992
The Stanford-Binet IV is compared to the original version and criticized for having less power to measure the high end of intelligence and for having norms that discriminate against gifted students. Strengths of the Stanford-Binet L-M are pointed out, and use of both scales for different purposes is recommended. (JDD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Cunningham, Grover – 1968
A study was conducted to determine if the observed changes in Head Start children were related to the practice effects inherent in a test-retest situation. The "control" group consisted of 64 children who had been eligible for a Head Start program. They roughly matched a group of Head Start (HS) children in IQ scores, age, and…
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Control Groups, Disadvantaged, Experimental Groups


