Descriptor
Source
| Roeper Review | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 3 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKitano, Margie K.; DeLeon, Josie – Roeper Review, 1988
The impact of the Stanford Binet Fourth Edition was compared with the Stanford Binet L-M on the identification of gifted children for a university affiliated preschool. The fourth edition test composite identified fewer preschool age children as gifted when the criterion was set at 1.5 standard deviations above the mean. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Analysis, Gifted, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedKluever, Raymond C.; Green, Kathy E. – Roeper Review, 1990
Composite scores for 51 gifted children (ages 3-12) on the Stanford-Binet LM were found to be significantly higher than scores on the Stanford-Binet 4th Edition. Correlations between the LM total and 4th Edition area scores were significant. Results suggest that the 4th Edition composite score cut-off value for assessing giftedness may require…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Eligibility
Meyer, William J.; And Others – 1969
A general working model of cognitive development assumes that there are sets of orthogonal cognitive abilities, which remain fairly stable after age 7. This paper examines the long term predictive and diagnostic value of assessing specific cognitive abilities among preschool children. This model by empirical studies was defendable on the grounds…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Eye Hand Coordination, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure


