Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Construct Validity | 7 |
| Intelligence Tests | 4 |
| Cognitive Ability | 3 |
| Factor Structure | 3 |
| Validity | 3 |
| Young Children | 3 |
| Academic Achievement | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Elementary School Students | 2 |
| Intelligence | 2 |
| Memory | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessment | 1 |
| Contemporary Educational… | 1 |
| Journal of Psychoeducational… | 1 |
| Journal of School Psychology | 1 |
| Psychological Assessment | 1 |
| Psychology in the Schools | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Preschool Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkDecker, Scott L.; Englund, Julia A.; Carboni, Jessica A.; Brooks, Janell H. – Psychological Assessment, 2011
Measures of visual-motor integration skills continue to be widely used in psychological assessments with children. However, the construct validity of many visual-motor integration measures remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the relative contributions of maturation and cognitive skills to the development of visual-motor integration…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Validity, Young Children, Program Effectiveness
Williams, Tasha H.; McIntosh, David E.; Dixon, Felicia; Newton, Jocelyn H.; Youman, Elizabeth – Psychology in the Schools, 2010
The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Fifth Edition (SB5), is a recently published, multidimensional measure of intelligence based on Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory. The author of the test provides results from confirmatory factor analyses in the technical manual supporting the five-factor structure of the instrument. Other authors have…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, School Psychologists, Construct Validity, Validity
Swanson, Jennifer R.; Bradley-Johnson, Sharon; Johnson, C. Merle; O'Dell, Anna Rubenaker – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2009
Three studies examine the validity of the Preschool Form of the Cognitive Abilities Scale--Second Edition (CAS-2). Significant high concurrent criterion-related validity correlations, corrected for restricted range, are found between the CAS-2 and the Detroit Test of Learning Ability--Primary: Third Edition for 26 three-year-olds (r[subscript c] =…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Test Validity, Young Children, Adjustment (to Environment)
Pomplun, Mark; Custer, Michael – Assessment, 2005
This study examines the validity of the measures of verbal and nonverbal working memory on the Stanford-Binet Fifth Edition (SB5). The validity evidence included Rasch-based, criterion-referenced item mapping, correlations with other clinical measures of memory, and prediction of reading and mathematics scores. The item mapping clearly…
Descriptors: Mathematics Skills, Validity, Reading Skills, Construct Validity
Download full textSmith, Douglas K.; And Others – 1987
The Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children were administered in counterbalanced order followed by the Cognitive Domain of the Battelle Developmental Inventory to a sample of 30 nonhandicapped, preschool children (13 males and 17 females). Correlations (corrected for restriction in range) among the three…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Analysis of Variance, Cognitive Ability, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewedMcCallum, R. Steve; And Others – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1988
Administration of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (fourth edition) to 60 elementary school students (in grades four, five, and six) resulted in means consistent with their gifted status. Factor analyses, including LISREL confirmatory analysis, offered only partial support to the Binet model. (TJH)
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Construct Validity, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedGridley, Betty E.; McIntosh, David E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1991
Studied structure of Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition for normal children who were not part of standardization sample. Found that, for children aged 2-6 years, either 2- or 3-factor model could be supported. For students aged 7-11, neither of 2 models studied was supported. Alternative model with verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning,…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Construct Validity, Elementary Education
