Descriptor
| Cognitive Style | 2 |
| Scoring Formulas | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Analysis of Variance | 1 |
| Cognitive Tests | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Measurement Techniques | 1 |
| Scoring | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Allen, Mary J. | 1 |
| McGarvey, Bill | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Rod and Frame Test | 2 |
| Group Embedded Figures Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAllen, Mary J.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
Adults took the Rod and Frame, Portable Rod and Frame, and Embedded Figures Tests. Absolute and algebraic frame-effect scores were more reliable and valid than rod-effect algebraic scores. Correlations with the Embedded Figures Test were so low that the interchangeability of these field articulation measures is questionable. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Adults, Cognitive Style, Correlation, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewedMcGarvey, Bill; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977
The most consistently used scoring system for the rod-and-frame task has been the total number of degrees in error from the true vertical. Since a logical case can be made for at least four alternative scoring systems, a thorough comparison of all five systems was performed. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Cognitive Style, Cognitive Tests, Elementary Education
