Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Creative Thinking | 2 |
| Semantics | 2 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Convergent Thinking | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Creativity | 1 |
| Creativity Tests | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Acar, Selcuk | 1 |
| Beisemann, Marie | 1 |
| Bürkner, Paul-Christian | 1 |
| Forthmann, Boris | 1 |
| Holling, Heinz | 1 |
| Runco, Mark A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Remote Associates Test | 2 |
| Torrance Tests of Creative… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkBeisemann, Marie; Forthmann, Boris; Bürkner, Paul-Christian; Holling, Heinz – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2020
The Remote Associates Test (RAT; Mednick, 1962; Mednick & Mednick, 1967) is a commonly employed test of creative convergent thinking. The RAT is scored with a dichotomous scoring, scoring correct answers as 1 and all other answers as 0. Based on recent research into the information processing underlying RAT performance, we argued that the…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Scoring, Tests, Semantics
Acar, Selcuk; Runco, Mark A. – Creativity Research Journal, 2014
Tests of divergent thinking represent the most commonly used assessment of creative potential. Typically they are scored for total ideational output (fluency), ideational originality, and, sometimes, ideational flexibility. That scoring system provides little information about the underlying process and about the associations among ideas. It also…
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Creativity, Creativity Tests, Correlation
