Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Item Analysis | 3 |
| Factor Analysis | 2 |
| Intelligence Tests | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Age | 1 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Color | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Carlson, Jerry S. | 1 |
| Facon, Bruno | 1 |
| Nuchadee, Marie-Laure | 1 |
| Wiedl, Karl Heinz | 1 |
| Wothke, Werner | 1 |
| Zimowski, Michele F. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Raven Progressive Matrices | 3 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkFacon, Bruno; Nuchadee, Marie-Laure – Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Standardized tests are widely used in intellectual disability research, either as dependent or control variables. Yet, it is not certain that their items give rise to the same performance in various groups under study. In the present work, 48 participants with Down syndrome were matched on their raw score on Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices…
Descriptors: Test Items, Standardized Tests, Down Syndrome, Item Analysis
Peer reviewedWiedl, Karl Heinz; Carlson, Jerry S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
Factor analysis of an administration of the Raven Progressive Matrices Test to children in grades 1, 2, and 3 revealed three orthogonal factors interpreted as (1) concrete and abstract reasoning, (2) continuous and discrete pattern completion, and (3) pattern completion through disclosure. Results are discussed in several contexts. (RC)
Descriptors: Age, Elementary School Students, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Download full textZimowski, Michele F.; Wothke, Werner – 1987
Tests of spatial ability were analyzed for their analog (visuospatial) and nonanalog (verbal reasoning) components, using factor analyses of items and test scores. The self-selected sample consisted of over 2000 clients (average age about 26 or 27) employing the Johnson O'Connor Research Foundation's aptitude evaluation services in 12 metropolitan…
Descriptors: Adults, Aptitude Tests, Content Validity, Factor Analysis
