Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accountability | 1 |
| Bilingual Education | 1 |
| Core Curriculum | 1 |
| Federal Legislation | 1 |
| Guidelines | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| Inferences | 1 |
| Language Tests | 1 |
| Learning Processes | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Second Language Instruction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Measurement:… | 1 |
Author
| Hill, Kathryn | 1 |
| McNamara, Tim | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Program for International… | 1 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHill, Kathryn; McNamara, Tim – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2015
Those who work in second- and foreign-language testing often find Koretz's concern for validity inferences under high-stakes (VIHS) conditions both welcome and familiar. While the focus of the article is more narrowly on the potential for two instructional responses to test-based accountability, "reallocation" and "coaching,"…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Test Validity, High Stakes Tests, Inferences
