Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 2 |
| Alphabets | 2 |
| Attention | 2 |
| Curriculum Based Assessment | 2 |
| Elementary School Students | 2 |
| Factor Analysis | 2 |
| Gender Differences | 2 |
| Grade 2 | 2 |
| Grade 3 | 2 |
| Handwriting | 2 |
| Hierarchical Linear Modeling | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 2 | 2 |
| Grade 3 | 2 |
| Primary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Oral and Written Language… | 2 |
| Wechsler Individual… | 2 |
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKim, Young-Suk; Al Otaiba, Stephanie; Wanzek, Jeanne; Gatlin, Brandy – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2015
We had 3 aims in the present study: (a) to examine the dimensionality of various evaluative approaches to scoring writing samples (e.g., quality, productivity, and curriculum-based measurement [CBM] writing scoring), (b) to investigate unique language and cognitive predictors of the identified dimensions, and (c) to examine gender gap in the…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Gender Differences, Curriculum Based Assessment, Scoring
Download full textKim, Young-Suk; Al Otaiba, Stephanie; Wanzek, Jeanne; Gatlin, Brandy – Grantee Submission, 2015
We had 3 aims in the present study: (a) to examine the dimensionality of various evaluative approaches to scoring writing samples (e.g., quality, productivity, and curriculum-based measurement [CBM] writing scoring), (b) to investigate unique language and cognitive predictors of the identified dimensions, and (c) to examine gender gap in the…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Gender Differences, Curriculum Based Assessment, Scoring
