Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Grade 8 | 2 |
| Learning Analytics | 2 |
| Mathematics Tests | 2 |
| National Competency Tests | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Behavior Change | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Competition | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 8 | 2 |
| Junior High Schools | 2 |
| Middle Schools | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| National Assessment of… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textCongning Ni; Bhashithe Abeysinghe; Juanita Hicks – International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2025
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), often referred to as The Nation's Report Card, offers a window into the state of U.S. K-12 education system. Since 2017, NAEP has transitioned to digital assessments, opening new research opportunities that were previously impossible. Process data tracks students' interactions with the…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Multiple Choice Tests, Behavior Change, National Competency Tests
Bosch, Nigel – Journal of Educational Data Mining, 2021
Automatic machine learning (AutoML) methods automate the time-consuming, feature-engineering process so that researchers produce accurate student models more quickly and easily. In this paper, we compare two AutoML feature engineering methods in the context of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) data mining competition. The…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Learning Analytics, Models, National Competency Tests
