Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
| Educational Researcher | 7 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 7 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| Kentucky | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| National Assessment of… | 7 |
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Goodrich, J. Marc; Thayer, Lauren; Leiva, Sergio – Educational Researcher, 2021
This study represents an extension of the findings of Kieffer and Thompson (2018) and evaluates potential correlates of state- and district-level achievement gaps in reading and mathematics between monolingual and multilingual students. Using data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, this study reported that there were substantial…
Descriptors: Achievement Gap, Reading Achievement, Mathematics Achievement, Grade 4
Mintrop, Heinrich; Sunderman, Gail L. – Educational Researcher, 2009
The federal accountability system, made universal through the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002, is a system driven by quotas and sanctions, stipulating the progression of underperforming schools through sanctions based on meeting performance quotas for specific demographic groups. The authors examine whether the current federal accountability…
Descriptors: Sanctions, Federal Legislation, Quotas, Accountability
Peer reviewedLapointe, Archie E.; Koffler, Stephen L. – Educational Researcher, 1982
Describes the creation and objectives of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), and reviews the findings of an evaluation of the NAEP, published in "Measuring the Quality of Education," by Wirtz and Lapointe. Focuses on the role that the NAEP can play in establishing uniform, national educational standards. (GC)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Objectives, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedTyler, Ralph W. – Educational Researcher, 1982
Critically reviews the preceding article by Lapointe and Koffler. Suggests that many of these authors' recommendations for program improvement need qualification. (GC)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Objectives, Information Utilization, National Programs
Peer reviewedBock, R. Darrell; And Others – Educational Researcher, 1982
Describes the evolution of national educational assessment in the United States, its present stage of development, methodological and reporting problems, and approaches applicable to assessment data. Examines how proposed approaches can be applied in the California Assessment Program and in the National Assessment of Educational Progress. (MJL)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Item Sampling
Peer reviewedKlausmeier, Herbert J. – Educational Researcher, 1982
Identifies trends in educational achievement in the 1970s. Presents hypotheses concerning the relationship between research and gains/declines in educational achievement during that period. Discusses a project for individualized learning programs and its theoretical rationale, and describes a research project based on that educational improvement…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Change, Educational Research, Educational Strategies
Peer reviewedWainer, Howard – Educational Researcher, 1993
Inferences that spending money (high average per pupil expenditure) does not improve education are questioned because of obvious differences in cost of living; in-state differences; differences in costs and demographic differences; and comparing average measures with measures from a nonrandom sample (Scholastic Aptitude Test scores). (SLD)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Gains, Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness

Direct link
