Descriptor
| Conceptual Tempo | 2 |
| Scoring Formulas | 2 |
| Cognitive Development | 1 |
| Cognitive Style | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Dimensional Preference | 1 |
| Early Reading | 1 |
| Efficiency | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Matching Familiar Figures Test | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textBrinzer, Raymond J. – 1979
The problem engendered by the Matching Familiar Figures (MFF) Test is one of instrument integrity (II). II is delimited by validity, reliability, and utility of MFF as a measure of the reflective-impulsive construct. Validity, reliability and utility of construct assessment may be improved by utilizing: (1) a prototypic scoring model that will…
Descriptors: Conceptual Tempo, Difficulty Level, Item Analysis, Research Methodology
Carroll, Jeri A. – 1977
To determine whether or not cognitive tempo influences visual cue preferences in early readers, 65 kindergarten, first-grade, and second-grade children were tested on the Matching Familiar Figures (MFF) test and a cue selection nonsense trigram test. It was hypothesized that significant differences would be found in cue selection strategies of…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Cognitive Style, Conceptual Tempo, Cues
