NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sam, Andrea; Wright, Ian – American Annals of the Deaf, 1988
Modified dilemmas from the Kohlberg Moral Judgment Instrument were administered to 15 hearing-impaired students, aged 12-15. Analyses indicated that subjects reasoned at Stages 1-2, whereas Kohlberg's norms indicate that hearing peers reason at Stages 2-4. A positive correlation was found between subjects' average scores for moral reasoning and…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Comparative Analysis, Hearing Impairments, Junior High Schools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bakken, Linda; Ellsworth, Randy – Educational Research Quarterly, 1990
The relationships of age, gender, and educational level with moral development in 94 middle-class 28- to 55-year-old adults (32 males and 62 females) were studied. Subjects were administered Kohlberg's Moral Judgment Interview (MJI). Males scored higher on the MJI than females. Findings support the continued development of moral judgment through…
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Comparative Analysis, Educational Background
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rorvik, Harald – Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1981
Piaget's test for moral judgment is more influenced by the personal relationship to others than is Kohlberg's. Kohlberg's test seems to a larger extent to measure the subjects' norms and emotional reactions connected to internalization of norms. Moral behavior is more closely related to Kohlberg's measure. (Author/CM)
Descriptors: Behavior Standards, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Emotional Response