Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Ability Identification | 1 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Academically Gifted | 1 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Creativity | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Motivation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Gifted Child Quarterly | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Georgia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Cognitive Abilities Test | 1 |
| Iowa Tests of Basic Skills | 1 |
| Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMcBee, Matthew T.; Peters, Scott J.; Waterman, Craig – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2014
Best practice in gifted and talented identification procedures involves making decisions on the basis of multiple measures. However, very little research has investigated the impact of different methods of combining multiple measures. This article examines the consequences of the conjunctive ("and"), disjunctive/complementary…
Descriptors: Best Practices, Ability Identification, Academically Gifted, Correlation
