Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Case Studies | 3 |
| Moral Development | 3 |
| Interviews | 2 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 2 |
| Moral Values | 2 |
| Abstract Reasoning | 1 |
| Academically Gifted | 1 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| Finland | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Defining Issues Test | 3 |
| Raven Progressive Matrices | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Craig, Patricia J.; Oja, Sharon Nodie – Journal of Moral Education, 2013
This mixed-methods study explored the moral growth of undergraduates in a recreation management internship experience. The quantitative phase reported moral judgement gains in Personal Interest and Post-conventional schema, and N-2 scores, as measured by the Defining Issues Test 2 (DIT-2), among 33 interns. The case-study method used a pattern…
Descriptors: Student Interests, Moral Development, Undergraduate Students, Moral Values
Edmondson, Macey Lynd – ProQuest LLC, 2013
This mixed methods study explored whether a relationship existed between moral development and dishonest academic behaviors in law students. The quantitative portion of the study utilized a survey adapted from James Rest's Defining Issues Test and Donald McCabe's Academic Integrity Survey. Law students were solicited by email from two public…
Descriptors: Ethics, Comparative Analysis, Moral Development, College Students
Tirri, Kirsi; Pehkonen, Leila – 2000
This study explored the moral reasoning and scientific argumentation skills of 31 gifted Finnish adolescents participating in a science program at the University of Helsinki. Students were given the Defining Issues Test (DIT) to determine their level of moral reasoning and the Raven test to evaluate their scientific reasoning. The argumentation…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Academically Gifted, Adolescents, Case Studies

Peer reviewed
Direct link
