Descriptor
| Psychological Testing | 2 |
| Test Use | 2 |
| Anxiety | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Depression (Psychology) | 1 |
| Diagnostic Tests | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Mental Disorders | 1 |
| Patients | 1 |
| Projective Measures | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Cox, Brian J. | 1 |
| Newman, Frederick | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Beck Depression Inventory | 2 |
| State Trait Anxiety Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedNewman, Frederick; And Others – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1987
Guidelines are offered for the use of progress and outcome measures as an integral part of: (1) treatment planning and progress review; (2) clinical supervision; and (3) program management. Scales with documented reliability and validity are listed. Some sources of computer software programs for scoring are given. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Projective Measures, Psychological Services, Psychological Testing
Peer reviewedCox, Brian J.; And Others – Psychological Assessment, 1993
To study the distinction between self-reports of anxiety and depression, a factor analysis was conducted using responses of 298 anxiety disorder patients on the Beck Depression Inventory and the State Anxiety subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Results suggest that the two conditions can be reliably differentiated in self-reports. (SLD)
Descriptors: Anxiety, Comparative Testing, Depression (Psychology), Diagnostic Tests
