Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Grade Point Average | 2 |
| Metacognition | 2 |
| Notetaking | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Behavioral Objectives | 1 |
| Classroom Techniques | 1 |
| Cohort Analysis | 1 |
| College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| CEA Forum | 1 |
| ProQuest LLC | 1 |
Author
| Gurley, Donna L. | 1 |
| Poole, Alex | 1 |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| ACT Assessment | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkGurley, Donna L. – ProQuest LLC, 2018
A sample of 130 students from a mid-sized research university in the southern United States were asked questions about their note-taking practices, particularly about the percentage of classes in which they had taken notes on a laptop for both the previous semester and for their entire undergraduate career. Note-taking method was then entered as…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Notetaking, Grade Point Average, Correlation
Peer reviewed
Download full textPoole, Alex – CEA Forum, 2014
One key difference between successful and struggling college readers is their use of strategies. The former can understand challenging texts due to their knowledge of how to apply a diverse range of strategies. In contrast, the latter are frequently unaware of when and how to utilize strategies, and, as a result, often cannot comprehend assigned…
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Reading Strategies, Freshman Composition, Classroom Techniques
