NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 93 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hongzhi Yang; Chuan Gao; Hui-zhong Shen – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-programmed automated writing evaluation (AWE) has attracted increasing attention in language research. Using a small data set arising from an analysis of five Chinese university-level English as a foreign language (EFL) students' submissions, this paper examined in detail how EFL students interacted with the…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Programming, Writing Evaluation, Computer Mediated Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Grant Eckstein; Ying Suet Michelle Lung; Natasha Gillette – TESL-EJ, 2025
Students are often encouraged to proofread their writing by reading it aloud. Presumably, this will allow writers to correct local errors. Yet even though this strategy may be effective for native speakers, there is little empirical evidence of its benefit among second language writers. Therefore, we wondered how many errors second language…
Descriptors: Proofreading, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Dang, Trang Thi Doan; Scull, Janet; Chowdhury, Raqib – International Journal of Instruction, 2022
This exploratory study investigated Vietnamese secondary students' engagement in a sequence of detecting, correcting, and rewriting tasks, and examined the factors affecting their engagement and/or disengagement in the process. The study draws on the principles of task-based instruction, involving eight mixed-ability groups (n = 31), and was…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Secondary School Students, Feedback (Response), Error Correction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Douglas Hamano-Bunce – Language Teaching Research, 2025
There is growing consensus that the provision of Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) on second language (L2) writing is beneficial for long-term L2 development. Yet, while WCF may help improve linguistic accuracy, there is no evidence that it promotes the development of linguistic complexity. Further, WCF is also often laborious and time-consuming…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Revision (Written Composition), Accuracy, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mostafa Papi; Mahmoud Abdi Tabari; Masatoshi Sato – Modern Language Journal, 2024
This study explored the role of feedback-seeking behaviors (FSB) in how English-as-a-second language (ESL) learners benefit from written corrective feedback (WCF). Seventy-six learners enrolled in an ESL writing course at a major university in the United States completed an FSB questionnaire, wrote a narrative essay, received WCF on their essays,…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tajabadi, Azar; Ahmadian, Moussa; Dowlatabadi, Hamidreza; Yazdani, Hooshang – Language Teaching Research, 2023
Inspired by Vygotsky's sociocultural theory and Storch's framework of peer interaction, this study investigated the nature and outcome of peer interaction in EFL (English as a foreign language) learners' peer review and revision activities. During two 16-week semesters, 32 lower-intermediate learners participated in an Advanced Writing university…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Students, Second Language Learning, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pearson, William S. – Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2022
Many L2 learners preparing for high-stakes, on-demand English language tests (e.g., IELTS, TOEFL) undertake classroom-based test preparation involving the provision of teacher written feedback commentary (WFC) on writing that simulates test tasks. The assumption is teachers' knowledge of both the language and testing system helps develop…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jining Han – Language Learning & Technology, 2024
The present study applied a multiple-case study design to investigate Chinese as a foreign language (CFL) students' responses to computer-mediated coded feedback and the factors that influence students' responses in an online multiple-draft Chinese writing context. Three intermediate-level students of Chinese completed four drafts for which they…
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Feedback (Response), Student Attitudes, Influences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Nia, Zahra Azari; Valizadeh, Mohammadreza – Shanlax International Journal of Education, 2021
This study investigated the immediate and sustained effects of revision-mediated (RICF) and attention-mediated (AICF) indirect coded corrective feedback on the written syntactic accuracy development of 50 upper-intermediate Iranian EFL learners assigned to two RICF and AICF groups. They received eight-session treatments, followed by an immediate…
Descriptors: Instructional Effectiveness, English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Giang Thi Linh Hoang; Neomy Storch – Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2024
Research has suggested that the type of feedback learners receive can impact on whether learners understand the feedback, the extent to which they engage with it, and whether they incorporate it in their revised drafts. However, to date, only a small number of studies have investigated learner engagement with corrective feedback provided by…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Language Processing, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Koji Osawa – RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2024
With the recent rapid technological advance, second language (L2) educators have increasingly incorporated technologies into writing pedagogy. Two of the major technologies to promote L2 writing are e-portfolios and automated written corrective feedback (AWCF). Notably, feedback-rich portfolios facilitate L2 learners' self-regulation and writing…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Do, Thi Bich Thuy – Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2023
While several research studies have investigated the impact of peer review training (PRT) on writing quality of L2 students, effects of PRT on revision quantity and quality remain vague. The purpose of this study was to compare revision quantity and quality before and after a scaffolded PRT following Anderson's proceduralization theory. Twenty…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yu, Shulin; Zhang, Yiran; Zheng, Yao; Lin, Zhong – Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2020
While research on written corrective feedback (WCF) in second language education has proliferated over the past two decades, only limited information is available on the role of WCF in training translators and how WCF is used and implemented in translation classrooms. To fill this gap, this classroom-based case study examined the nature of a…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Translation, Chinese
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Elfiyanto, Sonny; Fukazawa, Seiji – International Journal of Instruction, 2021
The quality of written corrective feedback can strongly and positively affect students' writing achievement levels. This study aimed to examine whether written corrective feedback could improve students' achievement levels for essay writing and investigated which one from three different feedback sources--teacher, peer, and self--was effective in…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Writing Achievement, Achievement Gains
Taichi Yamashita – ProQuest LLC, 2021
This dissertation reports on the evaluation of a computer-mediated collaborative animation description task, where synchronous corrective feedback (SCF) serves as the primary source for grammar learning. The evaluation was conducted in an English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) writing program at a large research university in the United States. Using…
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Computer Assisted Instruction, Writing Instruction, Collaborative Writing
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7