Descriptor
| Grants | 2 |
| Philanthropic Foundations | 2 |
| Program Evaluation | 2 |
| Program Proposals | 2 |
| Action Research | 1 |
| Art Education | 1 |
| Endowment Funds | 1 |
| Financial Support | 1 |
| Fund Raising | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| Mental Health | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Regan, Daniel | 1 |
| Whaley, Arthur L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedRegan, Daniel – Design for Arts in Education, 1988
Examines the process of giving grants to fund projects in arts education, specifically the generation of funding recommendations through the peer panel system. Analyzes a National Endowment for the Arts panel as to its overall effectiveness and expense. Concludes that while the process is expensive, it works given the criteria used. (GEA)
Descriptors: Art Education, Endowment Funds, Financial Support, Fund Raising
Direct linkWhaley, Arthur L. – Evaluation Review, 2006
The lack of support for mental health-related projects by private philanthropy, even among those that express an interest in mental health, is due in large part to the subjectivity of the grant review process. To address this problem, Whaley, Rodriguez, and Alexander developed the Grant Proposal Rating Form (GPRF) to make the grant review process…
Descriptors: Grants, Program Proposals, Philanthropic Foundations, Mental Health
