Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Active Learning | 2 |
| Inquiry | 2 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 2 |
| Mathematical Models | 2 |
| Technology Integration | 2 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Computer Simulation | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Creative Development | 1 |
| Creativity | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Amy Adair | 1 |
| Bicer, Ali | 1 |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Kentucky | 1 |
| Massachusetts | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAmy Adair – Grantee Submission, 2024
Developing models, using mathematics, and constructing explanations are three practices essential for science inquiry learning according to education reform efforts, such as the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS Lead States, 2013). However, students struggle with these intersecting practices, especially when developing and interpreting…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Technology Integration, Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)
Bicer, Ali – International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2021
The purpose of this systematic review is to reveal the research findings that suggest instructional practices to foster the creativity of students in mathematics. Although several studies have investigated the effects of various instructional practices influencing the mathematical creativity of students, little is known about how the findings of…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Mathematics Instruction, Instructional Effectiveness, Creativity


