Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
| Teacher Education and Special… | 29 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 29 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 17 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Collected Works - Serials | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 4 |
| Policymakers | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| Bahrain | 1 |
| Kuwait | 1 |
| Oman | 1 |
| Oregon | 1 |
| Qatar | 1 |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Keller, Clayton; Al-Hendawi, Maha; Abuelhassan, Hadeel – Teacher Education and Special Education, 2016
The provision of special education for students with disabilities depends upon the availability of well-qualified special educators, which, in turn, depends upon the availability and characteristics of preparation programs. In countries of the world where special education systems are still developing the capacity to provide the education that…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Special Education Teachers, Teacher Education, International Cooperation
Blanton, Linda P.; Pugach, Marleen C. – Teacher Education and Special Education, 2011
The alignment of the teacher quality provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the transparency of low achievement of students who have disabilities under the testing mandates of NCLB have converged to create substantial renewed interest and activity in collaborative programs…
Descriptors: Preservice Teacher Education, Teacher Effectiveness, Models, Federal Legislation
Peer reviewedCipani, Ennio – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1985
A "hands-on" behavioral model of consultation is examined through a systems approach to three phases: (1) developing consultation objectives, (2) designing and implementing intervention, and (3) implementing quality assurance. Tasks and subtasks within each phase are identified. Implications for teacher education are noted. (CL)
Descriptors: Consultation Programs, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Models
Peer reviewedFriend, Marilyn – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1985
In designing consultation programs for special education teachers, three factors must be considered: (1) characteristics of consultation; (2) practitioner needs of consultation information; and (3) specific consultation skills to include in the training sequence. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Consultants, Disabilities, Inservice Teacher Education, Program Development
Peer reviewedTymitz-Wolf, Barbara – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1984
The need for special education faculty development is emphasized and factors contributing to faculty development failure (including arbitrary agendas and lack of incentives) and to success (such as systematic planning and programing and institutional support) are considered. A listing of administrative and individual/group options is presented.…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Faculty Development, Higher Education, Professional Continuing Education
Peer reviewedSutherland, Doris J.; Castleberry, Michael S. – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1985
Analysis of 16 master's level programs newly funded in FY 1983 was undertaken via an instrument designed to measure indicators of quality. All grant applications contained at least 72 percent of the indicators of quality; 40 items were present in 75 percent of the grants examined. (CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Graduate Study, Grants, Higher Education
Peer reviewedBurrello, Leonard C.; Baker, Kenneth T. – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1980
The authors propose a model for statewide planning and dissemination in the Comprehensive System of Personnel Development process, as mandated in P.L. 94-142, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act. (CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Inservice Education, Inservice Teacher Education, Models
Peer reviewedGilles, Cynthia A. – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1980
The author describes the Massachusetts and Northeast Region manpower planning projects, discusses the Comprehensive System of Personnel Development (CSPD) as a dynamic process, and reviews problems in its implementation in special education. (CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Inservice Teacher Education, Models, Preservice Teacher Education
Peer reviewedEvan, Mary Ann – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1980
The article outlines the process used in Oregon to initiate a Comprehensive System of Personnel Development (CSPD) in special education. Factors contributing to the CSPD success include extensive involvement of a wide array of people in the process, clear responsibility outlines, and workable size of the cooperative personnel planning council. (CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Inservice Teacher Education, Preservice Teacher Education, Program Development
Peer reviewedGreenan, James P. – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1982
Analysis of fiscal year 1980 Comprehensive Systems of Personnel Development of 49 states, the District of Columbia, and two trust territories revealed that vocational educators and vocational and career content are not reflected extensively in comprehensive personnel planning regarding the education of handicapped children and youth. (CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Program Development, Special Education, State Programs
Peer reviewedMerbler, John B.; Lawyer, Dale L. – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1984
The paper summarizes the design, content, and implementation of a faculty development program in microcomputers in the Department of Special Education at Ball State University. Three levels of training, from elementary BASIC programing through advanced applications of microcomputers, are described. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Computer Literacy, Disabilities, Faculty Development, Microcomputers
Peer reviewedMerbler, John B.; Lawver, Dale L. – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1983
A microcomputer laboratory for research, training, and service and a competency-based multilevel computer literacy training program for preservice special education teacher education students are described. Considerations in program development and implementation are noted. (CL)
Descriptors: Computer Literacy, Computer Software, Disabilities, Faculty Development
Peer reviewedMcLoughlin, James A. – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1981
The article describes a joint competency based training program to enhance cooperation between parents and teachers of handicapped children. Evaluation with 143 participants is noted to support the model's feasibility. (SB)
Descriptors: Competency Based Education, Disabilities, Models, Parent Education
Peer reviewedSalend, Spencer J.; Fradd, Sandra – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1985
The 50 states and the District of Columbia were surveyed on certification and training programs for bilingual special education. Results indicated that a single state had established a certification program for bilingual special educators, but that and institutions of higher education in only 16 states offered training for bilingual special…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Limited English Speaking, National Surveys
Peer reviewedSmith, Judy, Ed.; And Others – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1981
Eleven papers focus on the issue of dissemination in special education. (CL)
Descriptors: Diffusion, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Information Dissemination
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2
Direct link
