Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
| School Psychology Review | 27 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 27 |
| Opinion Papers | 9 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 9 |
| Information Analyses | 7 |
| Reports - General | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Education Level
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 5 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Larry P v Riles | 6 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Brittany N. Zakszeski; Heather E. Ormiston; Malena A. Nygaard; Kane Carlock – School Psychology Review, 2025
Despite the widespread use of school-based universal screening systems for social, emotional, and behavioral risk, limited research has examined discrepancies in ratings provided by teachers and their secondary students. Using the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS; teacher report) and mySAEBRS (student report) scores…
Descriptors: Middle School Students, Middle School Teachers, Screening Tests, Affective Behavior
Peer reviewedSattler, Jerome M.; Squire, Lisa S. – School Psychology Review, 1982
Considerable judgment is required in scoring some McCarthy subtests, as this research showed the results of the Draw-A-Design test to be disagreeably scored. Oral Vocabulary and Draw-A-Child tests offered few scoring discrepancies between examiners. Two different studies and protocols are discussed. (CE)
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Scoring, Testing Problems
Peer reviewedPeterson, David W.; Batsche, George M. – School Psychology Review, 1983
Issues related to an increasing incompatibility between school psychology and projective assessment are examined. These issues pertain to educational relevance, changing social and educational values, potential litigation, and technical adequacy. The authors conclude that there are few valid reasons for school psychologists to use projective…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Legal Problems, Personality Assessment, Projective Measures
A Response to Some Questions Raised About the Woodcock-Johnson: I. The Mean Score Discrepancy Issue.
Peer reviewedWoodcook, Richard W. – School Psychology Review, 1984
Twenty-one studies that reported mean score differences between the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability (WJTCA) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) Full Scale are summarized. The differences are found to be minimal and are attributed to data bias and WJTCA's higher correlation with achievement. (EGS)
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Comparative Analysis, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedKnoff, Howard M. – School Psychology Review, 1983
This response to Batsche and Peterson's article discusses the theoretical, empirical, and pragmatic merits of projective assessment when performed in the context of a comprehensive personality assessment battery. The projective measures should not be considered in isolation. The author concludes projective techniques are not incompatible with…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Legal Problems, Personality Assessment, Projective Measures
Peer reviewedJudd, Barbara; Judd, Ben, Jr. – School Psychology Review, 1981
The Jastak System of obtaining scores on "personality" dimensions is currently widely promoted. It is shown to be totally spurious, based on hereditarian doctrines long in disrepute, and dangerous in use. The promotional techniques used are also described. (Author)
Descriptors: Advertising, Heredity, Intelligence Tests, Psychological Testing
Peer reviewedMcShane, Damian A.; Plas, Jeanne M. – School Psychology Review, 1984
The authors respond to Brandt's critique (TM 508 782) of their work. They object to the unsupported criticism and indications that they "overgeneralize." They assert that cultural differences need not imply deficit. The needs of American Indian children demand the application of a variety of perspectives and interdisciplinary skills.…
Descriptors: American Indians, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests, Preschool Education
Peer reviewedEvans-Hampton, Tawny N.; Skinner, Christopher H.; Henington, Carlen; Sims, Sanpier; McDaniel, C. Elizabeth – School Psychology Review, 2002
Evaluates situational bias that could be associated with curriculum-based measurement (CBM). During CBM, students are timed while responding. Results showed that students' accuracy levels increased under the conspicuous timing conditions, but there was no interaction between timing condition and ethnicity for digits correct per minute, digits…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Ethnicity, Mathematics Tests, Test Bias
Peer reviewedChase, Christopher H.; Sattler, Jerome M. – School Psychology Review, 1980
Sattler's standard deviation technique for interpreting strengths and weaknesses on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale has been simplified by Kaufman and Waterstreet in the form of an easy-to-use table. A refinement of their table is presented, with an example to demonstrate its use. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Chronological Age, Error of Measurement, Intelligence Tests, Mental Age
Peer reviewedGresham, Frank M. – School Psychology Review, 1983
The multitrait multimethod model of test validation is a conceptual approach for collecting, organizing, and integrating this information in making classification and intervention decisions for handicapped children. Typical problems with assessment practice are discussed with suggestions for overcoming these difficulties using the…
Descriptors: Classification, Disabilities, Identification, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewedChase, Joan B. – School Psychology Review, 1985
Although formal assessment of children with severe disabilities raises many problems of measurement, evaluation by "standard rulers" is still essential. This article examines the role of the school psychologist in the measurement process and identifies issues related to the assessment of developmentally disabled children. (Author/EGS)
Descriptors: Developmental Disabilities, Disability Identification, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedThompson, Pamela L.; Brassard, Marla R. – School Psychology Review, 1984
This critique, of Cummings and Moscato's review (TM 508 777) of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability (WJTCA) argues that the WJTCA is biased toward achievement resulting in a discrepancy of scores for learning disabled students. This bias is incompatible with the aptitude/achievement discrepancy model of specific learning disabilities.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Tests, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedMcShane, Damian A.; Plas, Jeanne M. – School Psychology Review, 1984
Studies examining the performance of American Indian children on the Wechsler instruments are reviewed to provide the basis for an examination of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised research. Factors that potentially influence Indian performance on the Wechsler are presented. Suggestions for interpretation of the Wechsler Intelligence…
Descriptors: Adults, American Indians, Cognitive Ability, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedBrandt, Elizabeth A. – School Psychology Review, 1984
The authors believe the McShane and Plas literature review (TM 508 781) did not critically examine the methodological or theoretical problems in the cited studies. This uncritical examination resulted in a profile of Native American performance which did not control for English language fluency or for normal versus handicapped Indian populations.…
Descriptors: American Indians, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedBrown, Douglas T. – School Psychology Review, 1984
This article reviews the history and present status of interactional computerized assessment systems. It concludes that automated assessment is at a rudimentary stage of development especially in school psychology. Further research and development on tests specifically designed for computerization, rather than adapting existing tests to…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Software, Elementary Secondary Education
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2
Direct link
