Descriptor
Source
| Research in Higher Education | 3 |
Author
| Barnes, Laura L. B. | 1 |
| Barnes, Michael W. | 1 |
| DeCristoforo, Joseph R. | 1 |
| Layne, Benjamin H. | 1 |
| McGinty, Dixie | 1 |
| Roskens, Ronald W. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedRoskens, Ronald W. – Research in Higher Education, 1983
The Biglan model of classification of academic subject areas is outlined, and its practical implications and uses by administrators for faculty evaluation are discussed. The reasons for applying subject-area standards in faculty productivity studies are examined. (MSE)
Descriptors: Classification, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedLayne, Benjamin H.; DeCristoforo, Joseph R.; McGinty, Dixie – Research in Higher Education, 1999
At a large university, faculty ratings in five academic areas were collected from two groups of students using paper-and-pencil or electronic survey administration. The two modes yielded similar factor patterns, with ratings influenced by academic area but not survey method. Students felt more anonymous using the paper-and-pencil method;…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Comparative Analysis, Computer Oriented Programs
Peer reviewedBarnes, Laura L. B.; Barnes, Michael W. – Research in Higher Education, 1993
A study in one private university classified four academic disciplines as hard or soft and pure or applied, then compared student evaluations of courses for organization, breadth of coverage, group interaction, enthusiasm, grading, and individual rapport. Results suggest a single evaluation form may not be appropriate for all disciplines.…
Descriptors: Classification, College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria


