Descriptor
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Sign Language | 3 |
| College Students | 2 |
| Deafness | 2 |
| Hearing Impairments | 2 |
| Manual Communication | 2 |
| Memory | 2 |
| Self Evaluation (Individuals) | 2 |
| Skill Development | 2 |
| American Sign Language | 1 |
| College Freshmen | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Communication… | 4 |
Author
| Bersani, Henry A., Jr. | 1 |
| Elfenbein, Jill L. | 1 |
| Gamble, Mary Ellen Bellile | 1 |
| Lieberth, Ann K. | 1 |
| Lodge-Miller, Kristin A. | 1 |
| Luftig, Richard L. | 1 |
| Metz, Dale Evan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 3 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedLodge-Miller, Kristin A.; Elfenbein, Jill L. – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1994
Fifty-seven college students enrolled in their first week of introductory manual communication classes demonstrated limited ability to assess their own communication skills. A discussion of sign systems, interpreter skills, and ethics aided some students in putting their skills into perspective, but 41% continued to overestimate their abilities at…
Descriptors: College Students, Communication Skills, Deaf Interpreting, Deafness
Peer reviewedLuftig, Richard L.; Bersani, Henry A., Jr. – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1988
The learning of a list of 20 Blissymbols and comparable American Sign Language signs by 121 nonhandicapped undergraduate psychology students was compared. Blissymbols were learned significantly faster than manual signs, particularly in early learning trials. Results are discussed in terms of the memory requirements of the two systems. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: American Sign Language, Communication Aids (for Disabled), Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewedLieberth, Ann K.; Gamble, Mary Ellen Bellile – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1991
This study evaluated the recognition and retention of transparent and nontransparent manual signs by 50 sign-naive hearing college freshmen. There was a significant decrease in the number of nontransparent signs retained as the period of time after training increased. Implications for sign language training with nonverbal hearing persons are…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Communication Disorders, Higher Education, Maintenance
Peer reviewedMetz, Dale Evan; And Others – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1997
Students who are deaf or hard of hearing (n=231) used the Language Background Questionnaire (LBQ) to self assess their sign language and spoken communication skills. Formal independent estimates of these skills were also conducted. Comparison of results indicates a high degree of congruence between the self and formal assessments, which…
Descriptors: College Students, Communication Research, Concurrent Validity, Deafness


