Descriptor
| Data Analysis | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Policy Formation | 2 |
| Program Evaluation | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Basic Skills | 1 |
| Community Involvement | 1 |
| Compensatory Education | 1 |
| Court Role | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Evaluation and… | 2 |
Author
| Wiley, David E. | 1 |
| Wolf, Robert L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - General | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Education for All Handicapped… | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWolf, Robert L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
The Judicial Evaluation Method (JEM) is useful for aiding decision-making bodies to formulate policies. Broad public participation in complex issues is provided by JEM. (The conceptualization, policy formulation stages, and participant roles are identified; and the model is applied in two case studies). (MH)
Descriptors: Community Involvement, Court Role, Data Analysis, Data Collection
Peer reviewedWiley, David E. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
Title I Evaluation models using uniform procedures and data collection for state and national comparisons are interpreted as federal endorsement of basic, common competencies in reading and mathematics. Basic competencies, content homogeneity, conversion methodology, and validity of the evaluation are discussed. (MH)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Basic Skills, Compensatory Education
