NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Comments and Criticism: Comment on "Identification of Student Misconceptions in Genetics Problem Solving via Computer Program."
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Mike U. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1991
Criticizes an article by Browning and Lehman (1988) for (1) using "gene" instead of allele, (2) misusing the word "misconception," and (3) the possible influences of the computer environment on the results of the study. (PR)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Genetics
Response to Dr. Smith's Comments and Criticisms Concerning "Identification of Student Misconceptions in Genetics Problem Solving via Computer Program."
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Browning, Mark; Lehman, James D. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1991
Authors respond to criticisms by Smith in the same issue and defend their use of the term "gene" and "misconception." Authors indicate that they did not believe that the use of computers significantly skewed their data concerning student errors. (PR)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Genetics
A Comment on Predicting Genetics Achievement in Nonmajors College Biology [and] A Reply to Hafner and Stewart's Comments on "Predicting Genetics Achievement in Nonmajors College Biology."
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hafner, Bob; And Others – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1989
Criticizes the Mitchell and Lawson (1988) report from the viewpoint of individual interview method. Provides Lawson's reply to the comment by showing differences in research philosophy and methods. (YP)
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, College Science, Educational Research, Genetics