Descriptor
Source
Author
| Siegel, Linda S. | 2 |
| Taylor, Ronald L. | 2 |
| Baldwin, R. Scott | 1 |
| Ballash, Joan B. | 1 |
| Banas, Norma | 1 |
| Berube, Barney | 1 |
| Blakemore, Thomas | 1 |
| Braden, Jeffery P. | 1 |
| Brunwald, Bernice Bronia | 1 |
| Bryan, Tanis | 1 |
| Cremins, James J. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 38 |
| Researchers | 18 |
| Teachers | 4 |
| Parents | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Community | 1 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Students | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Larry P v Riles | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWard, Marjorie E.; Genshaft, Judy – Exceptional Children, 1983
Suggestions and recommendations are made for using the Perkins-Binet Tests of Intelligence for the Blind for low vision and blind children. Suggestions cover such aspects as organization and preparation prior to administration and scoring. (CL)
Descriptors: Blindness, Intelligence Tests, Partial Vision, Testing
Cremins, James J. – Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1981
The article reviews the significance and implications of Larry P. vs Riles, which found the use of standardized IQ tests on Black children unconstitutional for the purpose of the educable mentally retarded placement unless the court gives prior approval to the testing. (CL)
Descriptors: Blacks, Court Litigation, Intelligence Tests, Legal Problems
Peer reviewedMeyen, Edward – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This response argues that Linda Siegel's paper (EC221505) confuses measures of intelligence with predicted achievement, calls for doing away with the construct of learning disabilities rather than the discrepancy definition model, and overlooks the need to determine which students qualify for special educational services for treatment of learning…
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewedBaldwin, R. Scott; Vaughn, Sharon – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This critique of a paper by Linda Siegel (EC221505) challenges Siegel's assumptions on the relationship of Intelligence Quotient to learning disabilities as being unacceptable and non-literature-based, and points out that discussion of Intelligence Quotient cutoffs may be moot given that 49 states employ no cutoff for learning disabilities. (JDD)
Descriptors: Definitions, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification
Keller, Richard M. – 1997
This paper focuses on challenges to psychologists and psychology graduate students who are blind or visually impaired in the administration and scoring of various psychological tests. Organized by specific tests, the paper highlights those aspects of testing which pose particular difficulty to testers with visual impairments and also describes…
Descriptors: Adults, Graduate Students, Higher Education, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedStanovich, Keith E. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This commentary supports Linda Siegel's challenge to the learning disabilities field (in EC221505) to produce data indicating that dyslexic readers differ from other poor readers in their cognitive processing, educational prognosis, and response to treatment. The commentary also points out that the existence of Matthew effects reinforces Siegel's…
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewedBraden, Jeffery P. – American Annals of the Deaf, 1989
A study of 33 elementary/middle school deaf children correlated Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised Performance Intelligence Quotients (IQs) with Stanford Achievement Test-Hearing Impaired Edition (SAT-HI) grade equivalents and age-based percentiles. A second study of 64 children correlated nonverbal IQs from many tests with SAT-HI…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Concurrent Validity, Deafness, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedSiegel, Linda S. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
Use of the discrepancy approach in defining learning disabilities is challenged, as intelligence tests do not measure potential, are not independent from what is measured by achievement tests, and are not powerful predictors of low reading performance. Use of intelligence tests in analysis, identification, and definition of learning disabilities…
Descriptors: Definitions, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewedTorgesen, Joseph K. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
In commenting on Linda Siegel's argument (in EC221505) that Intelligence Quotient is not causally related to reading difficulties, this paper argues that Intelligence Quotient is relevant to the definition of reading disabilities but that present knowledge may not justify its use in the selection of children for special services. (JDD)
Descriptors: Definitions, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewedSwanson, H. Lee – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This response to Linda Siegel's paper (EC221505) suggests some alternative explanations of phonological processing as a basis for determining reading disability. Discussed are the use of pseudoword tests, the relationship between phonological coding and intelligence quotient, and the relationship between phonological coding and reading…
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Quotient
IQ Is Irrelevant to the Definition of Learning Disabilities: A Position in Search of Logic and Data.
Peer reviewedLyon, G. Reid – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This response to a paper by Linda Siegel (EC221505) on the relationship between Intelligence Quotient and learning disabilities addresses the differences between classification and identification, limitations in Siegel's conceptualization of intelligence, and the representation of the language and learning domains subsumed within the learning…
Descriptors: Classification, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification
Taylor, Ronald L. – Diagnostique, 1990
This article offers advice on interpreting intelligence quotient (IQ) data and other results from intelligence tests. Myths regarding the practical applications and broader implications of IQ profiles are debunked. Several warnings are given regarding test use along with general statements of intelligence tests' strengths and weaknesses in…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewedHishinuma, Earl S. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1998
Describes the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Revised and discusses its use in diagnosing learning disabilities or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adolescents and adults. It addresses ethical and legal issues, the schism of standardized testing vs. modifications, assessment alternatives, and practitioner guidelines. (DB)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Adults, Attention Deficit Disorders, Clinical Diagnosis
Peer reviewedSchwenn, John; And Others – Early Child Development and Care, 1988
Discusses differential and information processing theories of intelligence and the problems of measuring intelligence. Considers the influence of sociocultural factors on the test performance of individuals and the procedures which have been suggested to reduce bias. (RJC)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cultural Influences, Culture Fair Tests, Epistemology
Peer reviewedBryan, Tanis – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This response to a paper by Linda Siegel (EC221505) discusses research on the relationship between social skills and Intelligence Quotient or academic performance. The research indicates that it is erroneous to assume that Intelligence Quotient or academic achievement account for the social problems of children with learning disabilities. (JDD)
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Quotient


