Descriptor
| Advanced Placement | 2 |
| College Instruction | 2 |
| Essays | 2 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Interrater Reliability | 2 |
| Political Science | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| Standardized Tests | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| College Teaching | 2 |
Author
| McLauchlan, William | 1 |
| Miller, Jeff | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Teachers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Advanced Placement… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMiller, Jeff – College Teaching, 1999
A college faculty member who has graded Advanced Placement exam essays on U.S. government and politics, taken mostly by high school juniors and seniors, suggests that high school teachers and college faculty who assess the essays are not the best qualified persons to do so and that despite efforts to ensure consistency, the resulting scores are…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement, College Instruction, Essays, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedMcLauchlan, William – College Teaching, 1999
A faculty consultant to the Educational Testing Service for advanced placement (AP) test reading in U.S. government and politics responds to an article criticizing essay evaluation methods and criteria, finding in it a fundamental misunderstanding of the AP reading process and explaining why the essays are subject to less scrutiny for style,…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement, College Instruction, Essays, Evaluation Criteria


