Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Achievement Gains | 2 |
| Active Learning | 2 |
| Physics | 2 |
| Science Achievement | 2 |
| Calculus | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Discussion Groups | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Latvia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Force Concept Inventory | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textCinite, Ilva; Barinovs, Girts – International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education, 2021
Education research has repeatedly shown that active learning in physics is pedagogically more efficient than traditional lecture courses. Widespread application of the active learning is slowed down by the lack of data on the performance of the active learning in widely varying circumstances of different educational systems. We measured the level…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Physics, Scientific Concepts, Teaching Methods
Direct linkHenderson, J. Bryan – Harvard Educational Review, 2019
Peer Instruction, a pedagogy utilizing handheld classroom response technology to promote student discussion, is one of the most popular research-based instructional practices in STEM education. Yet, few studies have shed theoretical light on how and why Peer Instruction is effective. In this article, J. Bryan Henderson explores the Peer…
Descriptors: Active Learning, Peer Teaching, Learning Activities, Learning Theories
